glock20rocks wrote:They're not going to be playable in a DVD player...then they're not f***ing DVDs.
small prob with your criteria:
DVD-R/-RW/+R/+RW are'nt DVDs either...
|
||||||||
|
glock20rocks wrote:They're not going to be playable in a DVD player...then they're not f***ing DVDs.
glock20rocks wrote:All I can say is: About #$!@ time! Now hurry and get us the stupid drives!
I'll still need a 15-pack to back up my system...discs better be cheap.
And whatever happened to the holographic discs mentioned on this site awhile ago?
glock20rocks wrote:They're not going to be playable in a DVD player...then they're not f***ing DVDs.
HyperYagami wrote:Your argument is as flawed as saying Pentium 4 isn't really Pentium just because it doesn't fit into your ghetto 10 yrs old motherboard.
cfitz wrote:I think that is the gist of glock20rocks argument: Blu Ray isn't compatible with existing DVD player hardware. So, to me, glock20rocks' argument doesn't seemed flawed at all. Instead, your interpretation of it seems flawed.
HyperYagami wrote:The really gist of that argument is, Blu-Ray doesn't compatible with the existing DVD players then it doesn't belong to this DVD msgboard. <snip> So do we need a diff msgboard for every revision/version of a CPU? A logical line has to be drawn somewhere.
KuoH wrote:Where's Tiffy? Where's Tiffy!?!?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2024 CDRLabs Inc. |