Home News Reviews Forums Shop


Seeking archival DVD-DL for my Plextor PX-716A

General discussion about recordable CD, DVD and BD media and write quality testing.

Seeking archival DVD-DL for my Plextor PX-716A

Postby swsnyder on Sat Jun 24, 2006 5:41 pm

I need to buy a spindle of DVD-DL disks, for use wih a Plextor PX-716A drive. The intended use is long-term archiving, so quality is critical.

Given how pricy these disks are I am very concerned about making an expensive mistake.

Can anyone recommend or warn against particular DVD-DL disks on the 716A? Or, if not, can anyone suggest a method where I could make that determination myself? It doesn't seem practical to buy one of each brand at Best Buy for diagnostic purposes.

Thanks.
swsnyder
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 3:12 pm

Postby MonsterMan on Sat Jun 24, 2006 7:01 pm

Verbatium is the only company that actually makes good quality DL discs - +R or -R.

I haven't tried any DVD-R DLs yet, but my Plex does very well with the 2.4x DVD+R DLs - and it burns them at 6x. The 8x ones don't do as well with the Plextor.

As for checking quality; the PX-716 comes with the PlexTools suite which can do it.

However, I prefer Nero's CDSpeed (available free at www.cdspeed2000.com). However, it doesn't work with the Plex. Personally, I like BenQ's DW16xx drives for scanning. I use my DW1620 for just about every scan I make, although the 1625/1640/1650/1655 are just about as good...
BenQ 1655, BenQ 1620, LG 4167, Plex PX-716SA, Samsung SH-S162L, SH-S182M, Pioneer 111D, Lite-On SHM-165H6S and 1.9TB of HDDs to feed 'em and an X2/4800 to crunch for 'em.
MonsterMan
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby [buck] on Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:05 pm

You're going to be using them for long-term archiving? Do you really need the extra space afforded by them? If not, I strongly recommend just using quality single layer discs. DL is a bit flakier and unproven compared to SL.

If you *must* have DL, I'd suggest Verbatim 2.4/8X DVD+R DL.
Last edited by [buck] on Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
[buck]
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Ottawa, ON, CA

Postby MonsterMan on Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:37 pm

I second what [buck] said; single layer discs will have MUCH better quality than DLs. Not to mention they burn alot faster.

Tayio Yuden 8x DVD+R/DVD-R & Verbatium DVD+R 16x discs, when burned at 8x, offer some of the best quality you can get with a wide variety of drives...
BenQ 1655, BenQ 1620, LG 4167, Plex PX-716SA, Samsung SH-S162L, SH-S182M, Pioneer 111D, Lite-On SHM-165H6S and 1.9TB of HDDs to feed 'em and an X2/4800 to crunch for 'em.
MonsterMan
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby dolphinius_rex on Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:12 am

If you're absolutely stuck on DVD-RDL, the ONLY choice is Verbatim. Anything else is pointless and a waste of money. If you're only stuck on capacity, then I really recommend Verbatim DVD+RDL media instead of DVD-RDL. Why? Because DVD-RDL is only ~49-50% compatible with drives/players, whereas DVD+RDL is much MUCH more compatible (check videohelp.com's database!).

Like the other posters in this thread, I would still recommend single layer media over dual/double layer... although Verbatim's DVD+RDL has shown excellent lifespan abilities in my own personal lifespan tests. For single layer media, I would recommend Maxell Plus Series DVD-Rs, or Verbatim 16x DVD+Rs (burned at 12x). At this point I'm not recommending Taiyo Yuden, as I've seen too many issues with them degrading, just sitting around for 1.5 years in my room (not to the point of being unreadable, but more then I'm comfortable with considering it's Taiyo Yuden!).
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

Postby swsnyder on Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:37 am

Thanks for all the replies, eveyone.

I hadn't realized that DL was less reliable in addition to being more expensive. Hmm.. Now I'm re-thinking that decision.

Burn time isn't an important factor, but reliability is.

Thanks again.
swsnyder
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 3:12 pm

Postby Scour on Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:12 am

I agree, buy good SL-media. Much cheaper and more reliable, but use good media like MCC and Ty
Benq DW 1640, LG GH-20N, Pioneer BDR-208
Crucial M4, Sandisk SSD, Plextor M5S, Sandisk Ultra Plus, OCZ Petrol 256GB

cu
Scour
Scour
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1909
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Germany


Return to Recordable Media Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2017 CDRLabs Inc.