by LoneWolf on Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:31 pm
norbertofh wrote:I'm about to order the NEC 3500A this friday, but I'm still asking myself if I should go for the TDK 1616N instead, although this drive is more expensive than the NEC.
One other thing that is confusing me is that if the TDK is a rebranded NEC burner, why is there such a huge difference between the TDK and the NEC performances on the
Tom's Hardware test? If I was to decide just upon those tests, the NEC seems to be a much better choice than the TDK.
Confucious say "He who base purchasing decisions on Tom's Hardware Guide Reviews may get burned".
There are only a few truly huge hardware review sites on the web. Anandtech and Tom's are probably the two biggest. While they have some good things to say, in becoming as big as they have they have evolved into a "jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none" setup. For certain products, their reviews are pretty good. However, their tests often leave things out that a site with a narrower focus wouldn't. Or, they use software tools to do their benchmarking (in the case of optical drives at least) that an optical drive review sight might have found to not do the job adequately when reporting results. Finally, differences in drive firmware can make for variations in results.
Intel Q9450 @3.2GHz, Gigabyte GA EP45-UD3P, 4 x 2GB G.Skill @4-4-4-12
Antec P160SW case (modded), Xigmatek 750w PSU
3x 500GB (RAID-5), , OptiArc 7200S, ASUS E818A3T
Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer, Hauppauge HVR-1800, Radeon 4890
Dell 2407WFP