rdgrimes wrote:why not show for all to see how you have reached the oh-so promising ordainment of Plextor
Oh please, no! All we'll get is a rash of scans on discs burned at lord knows what speed on the Plex, compared with 52x (real 52x) burns on the LiteOn. Not to mention the Plex scans at 24x speed. Just let it drop, most readers can tell the difference between BS and evidence.
All right, I picked this to quote as it looked like the best, but I'm addressing EVERYONE here.
Many times I have posted many good comparisons of Lite-On vs Plextor. I'm not going to do it again, as I'm sick of it. I've already proven it, so why the f**k should I have to prove it again. You can disagree, but there really isn't much to disagree on.
What I really don't get is:
Why when people post scans of burns on Lite-On drives it is OK and informational, but when I go to post scans of burns done in the Plextor, it is a "rash of scans done at who knows what speed." I always post what speed everything was burned at, scanned at, PoweRec speed, everything.
I'm sick of all the Lite-On, Plextor, Benq, whatever fanism going on here. Whether it be by me, or anyone else. I have posted reasons of why I prefer the Premium for burning CD's, and I have backed it up with everything possible. For the PX-708A, I have posted reasons why, and backed it up with almost everything. Same goes for the LITE-ON LTD-163D that I think is the best DVD-ROM out there (only other one I'd accept as a reasonable anwser is the LTD-166S
)
The CD scans done in the Premium can not even be argued, it's been proven time and time again that it is just as accurate as CD Doctor, KProbe, and WSES. The DVD scans you can argue as much as you want, as I'm not even sure how accuarte (or inaccurate) it is. Considering they have a DVD Test Forum at CD Freaks (with most scans done in KProbe, with all types of drives) it must be at least partially accurate.