Page 1 of 1
Just bought LiteOn LTR-52327S, some questions...
Posted:
Mon Feb 23, 2004 3:29 pmby semit82
I got it with firmware QS0C already flashed from the factory.
Does anyone has a drive flashed with this version?
How good is this version?
(i heard that this version was making problems..?)
just a question..
how do i downgrade the firmware using the LtnFW.exe Tool?
(for example to QS0B)
Thanks.
Posted:
Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:06 pmby dodecahedron
congrats on your new drive!
so you decided to forgo the LG and buy a LiteOn! very good choice.
where did you buy it? how much did it cost you?
check out this topic about firmware utilities etc.
http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?threadid=83441
I bought it at D&R.. in Kfar-Saba
Posted:
Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:22 pmby semit82
i cost me 250 NIS
it was manufactured in November 2003, came flashed with QS0C.
but.... there was no LITEON Logo on it (Like in your review of it)
never mind...
i read that the best firmware is QS0B? is that currect?
Posted:
Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:29 pmby dodecahedron
where did you buy it?
yeah, i too heard that QS0B is the best for writing quality.
by the way the reviews are done by Ian, not me!
Posted:
Tue Feb 24, 2004 6:47 amby Bhairav
@semit82 - Get QS0B.. it's better (marginally) than QS0C.
Posted:
Wed Feb 25, 2004 4:09 amby CDRecorder
I've found that QS0B is marginally better than QS0C, too. I am personally using QS0B on my 52327S drives.
Posted:
Wed Feb 25, 2004 9:20 amby semit82
Did you downgrade or did you drive came with it?
Posted:
Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:14 amby Bhairav
semit82 wrote:Did you downgrade or did you drive came with it?
I had QS09 on it.. bought it in September last year.
Posted:
Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:21 amby semit82
Then why how did you decide to flash to QS0B and not to QS0C?
is the one you have better?
Posted:
Wed Feb 25, 2004 1:52 pmby CDRecorder
One of my 52327Ss came with QS08 and the other came with QS09. I actually tested QS0C on both drives, but when QS0B came out, I installed it on one of the drives, and it caused the write quality to be better (QS0C was available from
www.firmware-flash.com before Lite-On even released QS0B, so I actually used it before I ever saw QS0B).
Posted:
Wed Feb 25, 2004 3:02 pmby semit82
So you say that QS0B is better than QS0C?
then should i diwngrade?
or "if it works, don't fix it?"
Posted:
Wed Feb 25, 2004 5:25 pmby CDRecorder
I think that "If it works, don't fix it" applies here unless you're really picky about your writing quality (like I am). The writing quality with QS0C is certainly not bad, it's just a little better with QS0B.