Page 1 of 1

amd duran processor

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:14 pm
by coonsanders
hi

can nero 6 work with a amd duran processor??thanks

coonsanders

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:35 pm
by MonsterMan
It should...what's the clock speed of the cpu? I think Nero's system requirments state a 600MHz min.; it shouldn't have too much trouble running on something slower, so long you keep away from the cpu-intensive stuff (ie, for MP3->AudioCD, maybe burn an image first, then burn the image)...

Nero 6.6 runs just fine on my friends 1GHz Athlon...and the Duron is just a "budget" Athlon...

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:18 pm
by hoxlund
the system i built for my brother years ago is a 1ghz duron with 512mb ddr2100 memory

runs just fine on that setup

course its a custom built pc, none of the bloated down stuff you get with a retail computer, geforce 3 vid card

amd duran processor

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 9:28 pm
by coonsanders
hi

the reason im asking is because i was coping an lp into the computer
using nero 6 sountrax.in the middle of recording it just stopped working.
the stop buttom was pushed and not by me.i tried to push the start bott-
on again and it worked.im wondering why it would stop like that....

coonsanders

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 9:50 pm
by Ian
Gremlins?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:51 am
by LoneWolf
Personally, I would go with AMD's budget dual-core version of that processor, the Duran-Duran.

;)



P.S. I've run Nero on Duron processors just fine. As long as you're not doing heavy video encoding with NeroVision (which might work, but would probably be extremely slow) you should be fine.

amid athlone processor

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:57 pm
by coonsanders
hi

gremlins? LOLdoes anyone no how to config avg free anti virue software?
it might be a config problem.

coonsanders

PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:57 pm
by dodecahedron
LoneWolf wrote:Personally, I would go with AMD's budget dual-core version of that processor, the Duran-Duran.

very nice pun! well done :D

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:49 am
by LoneWolf
dodecahedron wrote:
LoneWolf wrote:Personally, I would go with AMD's budget dual-core version of that processor, the Duran-Duran.

very nice pun! well done :D


Blame it on my "child of the 80's" experiences. ;)

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:50 pm
by dodecahedron
:wink:
another old-timer i see! :P

PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:16 pm
by LoneWolf
dodecahedron wrote::wink:
another old-timer i see! :P


I can remember when DOS 5.0 was brand-spanking new. Still used DOS 3.31 for awhile (since 4 was so horrible) to make sure there were no issues with the new release. ;)