Page 1 of 1

On-board Graphics...

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2003 9:42 pm
by bimbla
Between the on-board graphics solution provideed by Nvidia, Intel, VIA and ATI, which performs better?

bimbla.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2003 10:53 pm
by aviationwiz
I'd vote Nvidia, but on-board graphics are never good.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 12:08 am
by wicked1
nvidia nforce2 boards with onboard video is not bad. It is a Geforce 4 mx440 on the MSI-K7N2G-ILSR. I liked it alot better than the Geforce 2 it replaced.I had to upgrade video cards again as the onboard one cant take high bus speeds.I have a Nvidia 5600 Ultra now and love it but for most use including Quake 3 and the such the onboard ones from nvidia are pretty good.

On-board graphics...

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 9:17 pm
by bimbla
Is there any website which carried an article compating all the on board graphics chips?

bimbla.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 11:34 pm
by hammad
ATI rs300 is the most powerful onboard graphics now .
It is the first to have directx 8 pixel and vertex shader,fastest t&l engine and a 4pixel pipeline in onboard graphics.

http://www.asus.com/products/mb/socket4 ... erview.htm

http://www.pcpartner.com/products/ATI/M-A38.htm

http://www.fic.com.tw/product/motherboa ... del_id=129

http://www.sapphiretech.com/mainboard/ma39.asp

PostPosted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 11:48 pm
by hammad

PostPosted: Sat Nov 22, 2003 4:55 am
by integspec
Afaik, On board or Add on, the performance should be same. I prefer ATI and Nvidia comes as second choice. If you can, stay away from Intel because, it's only meant for Corporate usage but not for gaming (Assuming you are a gamer).