Another crazy one!Removing the word 'evolution' from classes
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 2:04 pm
The topic was 1 character too long, so I removed the space between the '!'
and 'R' to make it fit.
Anyway:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/EDUCATION/01/30/striking.evolution.ap/index.html
They are still going to teach the concept of evolution, but without using the word 'evolution'!!!
How much sense does that make?
Better yet, here is a quote that basically says that they won't be required
to buy new books, and won't be forced not to use the word 'evolution':
Superintendent Kathy Cox said the concept of evolution would still be taught under the proposal, but the word would not be used. The proposal would not require schools to buy new textbooks omitting the word evolution and would not prevent teachers from using it.
How much sense does this make???!!!
and 'R' to make it fit.
Anyway:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/EDUCATION/01/30/striking.evolution.ap/index.html
They are still going to teach the concept of evolution, but without using the word 'evolution'!!!
How much sense does that make?
Better yet, here is a quote that basically says that they won't be required
to buy new books, and won't be forced not to use the word 'evolution':
Superintendent Kathy Cox said the concept of evolution would still be taught under the proposal, but the word would not be used. The proposal would not require schools to buy new textbooks omitting the word evolution and would not prevent teachers from using it.
How much sense does this make???!!!