you know what this forum needs?
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 3:06 pm
more me
Your source for storage related news and reviews.
http://www.cdrlabs.com/forums/
http://www.cdrlabs.com/forums/you-know-what-this-forum-needs-t21265.html
JamieW wrote:Mission Impossible movies while great action movies are not good MI flicks. Anyone agree?
JamieW wrote:Mission Impossible movies while great action movies are not good MI flicks. Anyone agree?
JamieW wrote:more me
JamieW wrote:more me
hoxlund wrote:ok for movie retardedness
doom, ok
way in the future, where the fuck are their night vision goggles?
CowboySlim wrote:JamieW wrote:more me
I'd rather go hunting with Dick Cheney than ride in Ted Kennedy's car!
I wouldn't say there would be no betrayals...but I would say Jim Phelps never would have been a traitor. That killed the first movie for me.JamieW wrote:Here's why I think MI movies were craptacular MI titles. Mission Impossible stories were based on the premise that this group has been selected by the smartest people. No stone left unturned. They are the absolute best available. And they are loyal. In the MI series there would be NO betrayals. Yet all the MI movies are based on an insider betrayal. Like the people selecting these MI agents are going to miss the "will betray team for personal gain" part? Doubtful. Which is why I say they are great action movies, but horrible MI titles.