Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:44 am
Dodeca, try upgrading to B7T9. Give it a shot.. all those awesome 99 Quality Scores seem to be with T9..
Your source for storage related news and reviews.
http://www.cdrlabs.com/forums/
http://www.cdrlabs.com/forums/bad-batches-verbatim-mcc-02rg20-amazon-t19124-25.html
dodecahedron wrote:will do.
(just as soon as i'm finished - i'm right now in the middle of a complete system backup. 4 DVDs - that's all my life's worth...how lame is that ?)
is B7T9 supposed to be better than B7V9 ?
Bhairav wrote:Dodeca, stick with T9. Those MCC003 results aren't that bad at all, and those Yuden scans look positively schweet with T9.
dodecahedron wrote:Bhairav wrote:Dodeca, stick with T9. Those MCC003 results aren't that bad at all, and those Yuden scans look positively schweet with T9.
re the MCC scans aren't bad at all: i really have no experience etc. so i'll take your word for it.
but still the B7P9 are better on the MCC, wouldn't you agree? the first verbatim pic above. the difference is quite marked!
how about B7U9 and B7V9? not as good as B7T9?
MediumRare wrote:Just a bit off topic...
dodecahedron: I noticed that the trace of the writing speed isn't on the scans of the newer data disks (CD Speed test disk) that you created. It is on the older one you posted.
Did you disable this option in the program or is it a bug in the new version?