Home News Reviews Forums Shop


Which drive do I get rid of?

DVD-R/W, DVD+R/RW, DVD-RAM

Which drive do I get rid of?

Postby 88keyz on Sat Mar 18, 2006 6:55 pm

I currently have 3 DVD-RW drives, LG 4167B (DL13 firmware), NEC 3520A (3.07 bitsetting firmware by Liggy) and Pioneer 110D (crossflashed to 110 8.39 Buffalo firmware) and I am giving one away tomorrow. I was wondering which drive the forum members think I should give away. Any thoughts?
88keyz
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 9:27 am

Postby Scour on Sat Mar 18, 2006 10:34 pm

Hello!

I would say, give away the NEC :)

It´s the oldest of this 3, i guess
Benq DW 1640, LG GH-20N, Pioneer BDR-208
Crucial M4, Sandisk SSD, Plextor M5S, Sandisk Ultra Plus, OCZ Petrol 256GB

cu
Scour
Scour
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1909
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Germany

Postby TCAS on Sat Mar 18, 2006 11:01 pm

I would go for LG since there isn't that much community f/w support for it.
TCAS
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 981
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2001 8:00 pm

Postby Justin42 on Sat Mar 18, 2006 11:13 pm

I'd say the NEC for its age. It's a solid burner but rapidly becoming obsolete.
Justin42
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 723
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 10:30 pm

Postby dolphinius_rex on Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:08 am

I also think the NEC. The Pioneer should be able to handle anything you'd want the NEC for, and the LG will round things out for overall media compatability.
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

Postby 88keyz on Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:25 am

The NEC seems to be fighting a losing battle here. A question about the write quality of the NEC vs. Pioneer. The Pioneer seems to have taken a bit of a beating for its write quality (though I must admit I was very impressed with the burn I did of a +R TY 8x disc earlier today) and media compatability (only writes at 8x on some of my "burns for friends" 16x CMC media) where as the NEC drive has never been accused of being a bad or marginal writer, does Pioneer have a good history with its firmware support to correct such problems or is this writer going the way of the dodo because the DVR-111 is available now? The use of quality media isn't really an issue for me as I usually genuine TY, RICOHJPN or Maxell MIJ media (almost always +R). Overall write quality does matter though because I'll use cheaper stuff from CMC or RITEK for burning stuff for friends. Bitsetting is a must but all 3 drives support that with their current firmwares and both the NEC and the Pioneer will do quality scanning. Keep those opinions and reasons coming, I really want to hear what you have to say.
88keyz
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 9:27 am

Postby dolphinius_rex on Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:45 am

The LG will probably do better on 16x media that isn't based on Japanese technology, which is why I said it would round things off nicely for media compatability. The problem with the LG is that it tends to create burns with very high jitter. But if you're friends give you lower end media, then what do they expect?

As for quality testing, both the Pioneer and the NEC suffer from the same flaws in this regard, and I wouldn't consider either one of them a viable solution. Rather, I would recommend running transfer rate tests on the LG drive at full speed. The NEC is too picky a reader for this, although the Pioneer could also be used for transfer rate tests I suppose.
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

Postby Gabe on Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:21 pm

Replace the NEC, my opinion
WD: WD6400AAKS, WD10EALS, WD20EARS, WD10EALS
Hitachi: 7K1000.B 1 TB, 7K1000.C 1 TB, 7K2000 2TB, 7K3000 2TB
Seagate: ST2000DL003, ST31000528AS
Samsung HD204UI
LG GH-22NS50
Plextor PX 755 1.04
Benq DW 1670 1.03
Optiarc AD 7173A 1.01
Asus DRW 20B1LT 1.00
Gabe
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 10:35 am

Postby vinnie97 on Sun Mar 26, 2006 12:49 am

Justin42 wrote:I'd say the NEC for its age. It's a solid burner but rapidly becoming obsolete.

I'm still using my even more obsolete 3500...and I will until it dies or won't burn to anymore media. ;)
vinnie97
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 388
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby Justin42 on Sun Mar 26, 2006 3:40 pm

Hey, I still use a Sony DRU500a occasionally! I still say, on GOOD media (i.e., not crap Grade-D media from Taiwan), that was a very underrated burner. Considering it was the first 'dual format' drive, it's scans are still quite good. I still have a (declining) stash of 2x MIJ TDK media for it.

Obsolete isn't bad. :)
Justin42
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 723
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 10:30 pm


Return to DVD Writers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2017 CDRLabs Inc.