Home News Reviews Forums Shop


antivirus progs

Anything else

antivirus progs

Postby EmptyGarden on Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:20 pm

i have got trend-micro Pc-cillin antivirus installed, but i was wondering how it is compared to Norton antivirus and the others antivirus progs out there?
User avatar
EmptyGarden
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 12:03 am
Location: Stavanger, Norway

Postby Ian on Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:15 pm

I'm a little partial to Norton myself. I have both the personal and enterprise versions on my computers.
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 14996
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Postby tazdevl on Thu Dec 09, 2004 10:35 pm

Depends on what you're looking for... generally there is a tradeoff between detection rates and system impact. If you have a fairly fast computer >2 ghz , nothing tops Kaspersky. McAfee is a close second but has some bloat, though not as much as Symantec.

www.av-comparatives.org (click on comparatives) is a good site to check things out. It has two kinds on tests... a straight detection test using the most up to date signatures and a retrospective test. The retro uses old signatures and tests the AV apps ability to detect threat patterns with baddies that came out after the signatures.

Rokop is a german site, babelfish takes care of that, but the guys are very knowledgeable. They have some rollup results... www.rokop.de have to do some searching.

Don't believe one thing you read when it comes to mainstream publications like CNet, PCMag etc.. marketing dollars buys the results and keeps the competition low (as in not a full spread of AV apps tested)... and the testers are generally incompetent.


FYI Trend Micro blows, horrible detection rates. You'd be better off with Symantec which isn't a huge step up.

I personally use NOD32. Very light, great detection rates. I use Kaspersky as my backup scanner.
RIG:
P4 2.6C, Thermalright SP94/Panaflo 92MM M1A, IC7 Max3, Swifty MCX159, 1GB Geil PC4000 Ultra Plat, Radeon 8500, Audigy 2, 2X WD Raptor RAID 0, WD 250GB SE, Plex 708A, 166SDVD, LianLi PC75, XP Pro.
User avatar
tazdevl
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 11:03 pm

Postby hoxlund on Fri Dec 10, 2004 1:51 am

i swap back and forth from mcafee and norton, but right now im running norton systemworks 05 premiere
Thermaltake Core X5 Snow Edition TG Case
Corsair RM1000 Power Supply
MSI X399 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
AMD Threadripper 1950x @ 4.1GHz
Custom Loop w/ EK MSI x399 Monoblock
G.Skill 4x8GB DDR4 3200 RGB Memory
MSI 1080Ti Lightning X Video Card
User avatar
hoxlund
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 12:55 am
Location: Idaho

Postby pranav81 on Sat Dec 11, 2004 3:06 pm

I use NAV 2005 currently and have faced no problems.I have had no problems with Norton for long.



::Pranav::
Increasingly mathematics will demand the courage to face its implications.
User avatar
pranav81
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 6:57 am
Location: Solapur,Maharashtra,India

Postby dodecahedron on Sat Dec 11, 2004 4:31 pm

hey Pranav, how is Norton 2005 as opposed to Norton 2004 which was a terrible resource hog?
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the land of Mordor, where the Shadows lie
-- JRRT
M.C. Escher - Reptilien
User avatar
dodecahedron
DVD Polygon
 
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 12:04 am
Location: Israel

Postby hoxlund on Sat Dec 11, 2004 5:22 pm

i think 05 is a little better on resources then 04
Thermaltake Core X5 Snow Edition TG Case
Corsair RM1000 Power Supply
MSI X399 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
AMD Threadripper 1950x @ 4.1GHz
Custom Loop w/ EK MSI x399 Monoblock
G.Skill 4x8GB DDR4 3200 RGB Memory
MSI 1080Ti Lightning X Video Card
User avatar
hoxlund
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 12:55 am
Location: Idaho

Postby pranav81 on Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:58 am

Yes.I think NAV 2005 is a little better than NAV 2004,which I had to remove only after a day of using it.
NAV 2005 is also resource hungry,but offers a wide spectrum of protection.NAV has saved my day countless times.



::Pranav::
Increasingly mathematics will demand the courage to face its implications.
User avatar
pranav81
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 6:57 am
Location: Solapur,Maharashtra,India

Postby dodecahedron on Sun Dec 12, 2004 11:44 am

how does Norton 2005 compare with 2003 (with respect to resource hogging) ?
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the land of Mordor, where the Shadows lie
-- JRRT
M.C. Escher - Reptilien
User avatar
dodecahedron
DVD Polygon
 
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 12:04 am
Location: Israel

Postby pranav81 on Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:46 am

NAV 2003 hogs the system less than NAV 2005.NAV has 2005 many advanced options that are not in NAV 2003.


::Pranav::
Increasingly mathematics will demand the courage to face its implications.
User avatar
pranav81
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 6:57 am
Location: Solapur,Maharashtra,India

Postby dodecahedron on Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:23 am

i guess i'll stick with 2003.
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the land of Mordor, where the Shadows lie
-- JRRT
M.C. Escher - Reptilien
User avatar
dodecahedron
DVD Polygon
 
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 12:04 am
Location: Israel


Return to General Software Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2019 CDRLabs Inc.