Cool Post, Thanks
cfitz wrote:Seriously, you wouldn't be able to print at the same time you burn, because the disc is spinning too fast when burning (see above picture for likely result). So you would still have a two-step process and wouldn't save any appreciable time. Next, add in the extra space required (one extra drive bay used up), the extra expense required, and the limited utility (it only prints on DVDs unless you figure out a way to crumple up your term paper and jam it into the drive door). Finally, consider the wisdom of mixing opaque inks into the same compartment as an optical drive, and it all points to the idea being simply impractical.
While I agree it would be difficult, certainly not impossible. Ideally one would use existing white ink jet media. But, That doesn't have to be a given. Look at HP and LightScribe, they used the existing laser but have invented a whole new class of media, complete with royalities.
I simply refuse to reject out-of-hand, that a suitable ink cannot be found that will stay in place on a 10,000 RPM disc. Yes, it won't be the same Epson ink we use today, but can such an ink be invented. I say emphatically
YES!!!
As to the size, FH today, HH tomorrow. Things always get smaller. Even at FH, its still preferable to another printer. That fact alone with ensure a measure of success for LightScribe. Another possible solution is a 5.25" HH printer, independent of the burner.
I'm surprised, in such a technically sophisticated audience, used to seeing innovation on a daily basis, so many nay sayers.
![d'oh! #-o](http://www.cdrlabs.com/forums/images/smilies/eusa_doh.gif)