Home News Reviews Forums Shop


Good DVD readers

How fast is too fast?

Good DVD readers

Postby Nil Einne on Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:23 am

Hey all,

I'm looking for a good DVD reader (reader only, I'm not looking at burners). What features especially interested me are good performance with reading DVDs (Video, ROMs, DVD+-R & RW) esp good performance when reading problematic DVDs (damaged, poor writes, poor quality DVD+-R/W) etc. Noise (or the lack of it) is also of interest to me. Performance with all types of CDs (audio, ROM, VCD, CDR, CD-RW etc) and problematic CDs is also of some interest. Reading copyrighted CDs/DVDs is not really of much interest. Reading backup CDs and DVDs is of some interest however.

I would especially be interested in model numbers of any drives mentioned and in specifics esp with regards to whether you've actually tried any other drive or not (ABC rocks or XYZ is the best reader are not really the most informative of statements).

And altho all drive brands are welcome, the four that are of most interest to me are Samsung (cheapest) aka Toshiba, LG (midrange), Aopen (midrange) and LiteOn (most expensive I'm wlling to pay). The Benq is a bit too expensive for my liking.

Thanks all

P.S. I have done some searches but there is a lack of info on LG and altho many people seem to like LiteOn, Benq and Toshiba, there is only limited info on why this is so and there appears to be a concentration on things like ability to read copyrighted CDs as well as absolute read speed differences on good quality CDs (which usually don't vary that significantly) compared to more important issues like ability and speed on poor quality CDs (which often varies quite siginificantly)
Nil Einne
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:42 pm

Postby hoxlund on Tue Jan 18, 2005 1:23 pm

ive had toshiba drives and pioneer dvd rom drives in the past, those seem to be pretty good for ripping purposes

my JLMS 166s was pure crap, couldn't hold up to my ripping demands
Fractal Design Define R5 White Window Case
Corsair RM1000 Power Supply
MSI X99A XPower AC USB 3.1 Motherboard
Intel i7-5930K CPU @ 4.8GHz
Corsair H100i GTX 240mm CPU Cooler
Mushkin Blackline 4x8GB DDR4 2400 Memory
Asus 980Ti Strix OC
User avatar
hoxlund
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 12:55 am
Location: RAF Lakenheath / Suffolk United Kingdom

Toshi all the way :)

Postby shaun on Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:13 pm

Toshiba and Lite-Ons are my favourite :)

Toshiba's drives are quite and quick..and they eat most copy protections alive :)

"Back in the day" (lol..2002), you couldn't beat the Toshiba and Plextor duo for CloneCD. Maybe I am just holding on to past affections...lol
"Traveling through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, boy"
User avatar
shaun
CD-RW PiMP
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 1:45 pm

Postby LoneWolf on Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:31 pm

My LiteOn/JLMS 166S worked well, but the build quality seemed average. I now have a LiteOn SOHD-167T, which appears to be a bit better, and rips as fast as the 166S.
Intel Q9450 @3.2GHz, Gigabyte GA EP45-UD3P, 4 x 2GB G.Skill @4-4-4-12
Antec P160SW case (modded), Xigmatek 750w PSU
3x 500GB (RAID-5), , OptiArc 7200S, ASUS E818A3T
Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer, Hauppauge HVR-1800, Radeon 4890
Dell 2407WFP
User avatar
LoneWolf
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Meecheegan

Postby Nil Einne on Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:40 pm

Thats interesting but as mentioned, ripping is not really the most important factor to me. Much more important is ability and speed of reading damaged DVDs (and CDs) as well as reading burnt DVDs (+R, -R, +RW, -RW) especially poorer quality ones since these are the kind of stuff I'm most likely to encounter. I might rip a DVD-video on occassion but this is only a small consideration. The other factors are much more important
Nil Einne
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:42 pm

Re: Toshi all the way :)

Postby Gabe on Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:33 am

shaun wrote:Toshiba and Lite-Ons are my favourite :)

Toshiba's drives are quite and quick..and they eat most copy protections alive :)

"Back in the day" (lol..2002), you couldn't beat the Toshiba and Plextor duo for CloneCD. Maybe I am just holding on to past affections...lol


The Toshiba 1912 is one of the worst drive for reading proteted CD´s with safedisc. Look here:

http://www.cdrlabs.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=18363
WD: WD6400AAKS, WD10EALS, WD20EARS, WD10EALS
Hitachi: 7K1000.B 1 TB, 7K1000.C 1 TB, 7K2000 2TB, 7K3000 2TB
Seagate: ST2000DL003, ST31000528AS
Samsung HD204UI
LG GH-22NS50
Plextor PX 755 1.04
Benq DW 1670 1.03
Optiarc AD 7173A 1.01
Asus DRW 20B1LT 1.00
Gabe
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 10:35 am

Postby Bhairav on Thu Jan 27, 2005 1:20 am

LoneWolf wrote:My LiteOn/JLMS 166S worked well, but the build quality seemed average. I now have a LiteOn SOHD-167T, which appears to be a bit better, and rips as fast as the 166S.


LoneWolf, how much time would a 167 rip a normal DVD movie, about 9GB or so?
Q6600@3.1Ghz | Asus P5Q-E | 4GB DDR2-800 | 8800GT | 4TB HDD | Viewsonic vx2025wm
Xonar DX | Pioneer DVR-212 | Pioneer 111L | Benq 1655
User avatar
Bhairav
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1239
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 5:44 am
Location: Bombay,India

Postby Nil Einne on Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:08 am

Given that DVD9/dual layer is only 8.5 gb, I fail to see how a normal DVD movie can be 9 gb :-P It could be 8.5 gb but to my knowledge (not much experience in ripping so can't say for sure) a lot of movies don't fill the full 8.5 gb. Maybe 8 gb or even 7.5 gb is a 'normal' movie (of course there is no such thing as normal, average is probably a better term)
Nil Einne
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:42 pm

Postby hoxlund on Thu Jan 27, 2005 2:50 pm

most people refer to dual layer discs as 9gb just for your info, they round up
Fractal Design Define R5 White Window Case
Corsair RM1000 Power Supply
MSI X99A XPower AC USB 3.1 Motherboard
Intel i7-5930K CPU @ 4.8GHz
Corsair H100i GTX 240mm CPU Cooler
Mushkin Blackline 4x8GB DDR4 2400 Memory
Asus 980Ti Strix OC
User avatar
hoxlund
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 12:55 am
Location: RAF Lakenheath / Suffolk United Kingdom

Postby Nil Einne on Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:59 pm

People refer to them as DVD9. I have never seen anyone refer to them as a 9 gb DVD. Although the 9 indicated gb, it is quite different saying how long does it take to copy a full DVD9 from saying how long does it take to copy a 9gb DVD...

(Also once again I should add, I think the 'normal'/average DVD movie is not full, it's probably 8 gb or maybe even 7.5 gb)
Nil Einne
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:42 pm

Postby Bhairav on Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:44 am

Nil Einne wrote:People refer to them as DVD9. I have never seen anyone refer to them as a 9 gb DVD. Although the 9 indicated gb, it is quite different saying how long does it take to copy a full DVD9 from saying how long does it take to copy a 9gb DVD...

(Also once again I should add, I think the 'normal'/average DVD movie is not full, it's probably 8 gb or maybe even 7.5 gb)


My bad, sorry :roll: I should have specified, about 8162MB, the average size of movies I rip. Happy?
Q6600@3.1Ghz | Asus P5Q-E | 4GB DDR2-800 | 8800GT | 4TB HDD | Viewsonic vx2025wm
Xonar DX | Pioneer DVR-212 | Pioneer 111L | Benq 1655
User avatar
Bhairav
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1239
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 5:44 am
Location: Bombay,India

Postby Nil Einne on Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:56 am

How did 8192mb become 9 gb?
Nil Einne
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:42 pm


Return to CD-ROM and DVD-ROM Drives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron
All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2017 CDRLabs Inc.