No. I seriously hope that you do not dream that Ritek were the only manufacturer who produces discs of different quality, and sells those different qualities under different names and different prices


|
||||||||
|
No. I seriously hope that you do not dream that Ritek were the only manufacturer who produces discs of different quality, and sells those different qualities under different names and different prices
No, that's you.I think you're confused!
Obviously not. Do you think that Ritek G04 sold as unbranded stuff contain a different RITEKG04 code than the ones Maxell sells??I know all about different brands have different manufacturers.
The only true sentence in your messageI am referring to FUJI YUDEN000T02 and your branded Plextor is made by the same manufacturer which is TAIYO YUDEN
You seem to think just because your discs are branded Plextor it would be better discs
Obviously not. Do you think that Ritek G04 sold as unbranded stuff contain a different RITEKG04 code than the ones Maxell sells??
Gen-An wrote:
My PX-712A certainly doesn't have any fantastic writing performance...
As Ian said: If the drive is doing such stuff as demonstrated with really good media, no one knows what it will do to bad media. Maybe it just explodesOK some disks are better then others thats fine, but the real point is better media or not the TLA:0000 716 and TLA:0101 716 seem to in 99% of cases have the so so or poor burns on media that does well on other drives at same speed , other drives meaning pioneer, NEC, BENQ, LG
Me too. At least for the sake of the people that bought the drive already.
alexnoe wrote:Neither was it with better media...
dolphinius_rex wrote:alexnoe wrote:Neither was it with better media...
Well, it brought the quality of more troublesome drives up to the quality of the less troublesome drives... but I still thought it didn't live up to its' hype.
Gen-An wrote:dolphinius_rex wrote:alexnoe wrote:Neither was it with better media...
Well, it brought the quality of more troublesome drives up to the quality of the less troublesome drives... but I still thought it didn't live up to its' hype.
I'm on my 3rd PX-712A (soon to be 4th when I RMA this drive, which was a refurb RMA for drive #2). The first one made coasters out of Verbatim 8x -R, with middling results on +R, the second made coasters out of TY 8x +R at 12x, this third one makes coasters out of TDK 8x -R, and Maxell 8x -R and gives pretty poor results with +R in general. I ran all on fw 1.05. If this fw brought the quality of my drives up to the level of the less troublesome ones I'd hate to see the more troublesome drives...
dolphinius_rex wrote:Hrm... I'm going to laugh if the new drive has a TLA of 0202 or something similar!
Ian wrote:dolphinius_rex wrote:Hrm... I'm going to laugh if the new drive has a TLA of 0202 or something similar!
You can start laughing.. because the drive I received has a TLA of 0202. It was also manufactured in November.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2025 CDRLabs Inc. |