axelrod wrote:1.) DL. I think, that would be nice. But, then I think, is it something that is going to be inexpensive and stable enough? If my primary goal isn't to copy DVD's, then it's still much cheaper (and potentionally more reliable depending on how the DL holds up) to burn 2 discs. Maybe thats rationalizing tho...
It is cheaper to burn two discs. No doubt about it.
And that's NOT going to change anytime soon.
The real draw for dual layer media right now is for DVD videos, either copying existing dual layer discs or for mastering your own for distribution.
Yes, its a nice feature to have in case you need/want it later. Especially since it really adds no cost to your decision.
But if you don't see yourself needing it, then it probably shouldn't be part of the decision.
axelrod wrote:2.) The NEC's reading quality is said to be subpar by many. Some even suggest "the NEC is a great recorder, just have another DVD drive to use as a reader/ripper". Thats not good news for me, this will be the only DVD drive I'll have in my PC. I'd like it to be able to work fine as a straight reader, even if my DVD movie has some scratches, not to mention being able to read discs from other drives, etc.
I've ripped some DVDs that I rented through Netflix because I wasn't goign to have time to watch them and I needed to return them in order to get new releases on time, and my NEC drive had no problems ripping them. Even heavily scratched ones.
And I personally have had no problems reading any DVDs with my NEC drive, including DVD-Rs/+Rs burned on other drives. I haven't tried any -RW/+RW since I don't use them at all. I will say that it takes a little longer for the NEC to recognize media, but only by a few seconds at the most.
axelrod wrote:3.) booktype/bitsetting (?). Okay, basically from what I understand this allows you to change a DVD +r or DVD -r to a "DVD-ROM" so it can be read by standalone players (I may be off on this analysis..). But, isn't it true that using -R discs will make them virtually completely compatible with standalones? Since the Pioneer excells in -R media.....
Yes, it allows you to change the booktype on a DVD+R or DVD+RW disc to DVD-ROM. This is because some settop DVD players, for whatever reason, actually use it to determine if a disc is a DVD. If it doesn't see DVD-ROM, it won't recognize the disc.
DVD-R/-RW media doesn't allow for changing the booktype as its pre-encoded on the disc. Some drives have a hack for this, although reports I've read from people who tried it, setting DVD-R to DVD-ROM this way actually caused the disc not to be read by their DVD player.
If you know anyone who has a DVD writer, ask them to burn a movie for you on DVD+R media without changing the booktype. If it plays on your DVD players, then bitsetting might not be a priority for you. (Though then you might also want to consider testing +RW media as well.)
If you are going with a DL drive though, it looks like bitsetting will be very important from initial results.
In general DVD-R media is more compatible it seems. Personally, I prefer DVD+R media as I find it writes better. My set top DVD player, however, plays both fine (without bitsetting) so bitsetting has never affected me until I burned a DL disc.
I don't think the fact that Pioneer writes DVD-R very well (and they should since they invented it) adds to the compatibility of the media any. The only problems I have heard about DVD-R media not working correctly after being burned was with NuTech drives when they first came out, and I think a BenQ drive whose burned DVD-R media could not be read on an Xbox. I've never seen any evidence that a DVD-R burned on a Pioneer is more compatible than a DVD-R burned on an NEC or vice versa.