Home News Reviews Forums Shop


Pioneer DVR-108 Preview @ PC Watch

DVD-R/W, DVD+R/RW, DVD-RAM

Pioneer DVR-108 Preview @ PC Watch

Postby Ian on Thu Jul 15, 2004 1:37 pm

Interesting read (if you can read Japanese):

http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2004/0715/dvddl.htm

16x DVD-R Write:

Image

16x DVD+R Write:

Image

I think I'll be holding onto my 12x drives a little longer.
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 15159
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Re: Pioneer DVR-108 Preview @ PC Watch

Postby aviationwiz on Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:18 pm

Ian wrote:I think I'll be holding onto my 12x drives a little longer.


You can say that again!
User avatar
aviationwiz
Plextor Fan(atic)
 
Posts: 4069
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:55 am
Location: Home of the Red Tail

Postby dolphinius_rex on Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:59 pm

why did they even bother?? that last speed jump is more likely to screw up the disc then it is likely to be worth the time difference. :o
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

Postby Ian on Thu Jul 15, 2004 3:06 pm

dolphinius_rex wrote:why did they even bother?? that last speed jump is more likely to screw up the disc then it is likely to be worth the time difference. :o


Bragging rights? Marketing? That way they can say that their drive writes at 16x.
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 15159
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Postby hydrogen on Thu Jul 15, 2004 3:07 pm

They should have stuck with 12x. The only reason I would be interested in this drive is because of the 4x dual layer support.

I guess you can always burn your discs at 12x instead of 16x. Hopefully it will give you that option.

It should be a good drive since the previous Pioneer burners were good.
hydrogen
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 2:38 am

Postby Ian on Thu Jul 15, 2004 3:50 pm

dolphinius_rex wrote:why did they even bother?? that last speed jump is more likely to screw up the disc then it is likely to be worth the time difference. :o


What time difference? It takes longer at 16x than at 12x!
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 15159
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Postby aviationwiz on Thu Jul 15, 2004 4:00 pm

Ian wrote:
dolphinius_rex wrote:why did they even bother?? that last speed jump is more likely to screw up the disc then it is likely to be worth the time difference. :o


What time difference? It takes longer at 16x than at 12x!


12x P-CAV that is...and remember when everyone said Plextor was nuts to make a 12x drive and not a 16x drive, :roll:
User avatar
aviationwiz
Plextor Fan(atic)
 
Posts: 4069
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:55 am
Location: Home of the Red Tail

Postby Noua on Thu Jul 15, 2004 4:31 pm

Did you guys noticed the firmware number? v0.50 ... Interesting... #-o could it be a preliminary test firmware? :oops:
Last edited by Noua on Thu Jul 15, 2004 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"We don't want to to put mankind on the moon but to bring mankind back to earth..."
Noua
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 8:34 am
Location: Portugal

Postby dhc014 on Thu Jul 15, 2004 4:32 pm

Noua wrote:could it be a preliminary test firmware? :oops:

Most definately.
dhc014
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1368
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2002 10:36 pm

Postby Ian on Thu Jul 15, 2004 4:34 pm

Yep, it is. They haven't sent out the v1.00 firmware to OEM's yet.
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 15159
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Postby Noua on Thu Jul 15, 2004 4:37 pm

So, maybe with future updates we could have some surprises, and of course burn improvements, because with those speeds the A08 is going nowhere.
It's true that 4x DL is something to think of, but again, i'd rather stick with an A07...
Nevertheless it's still to early to say anything...
"We don't want to to put mankind on the moon but to bring mankind back to earth..."
Noua
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 8:34 am
Location: Portugal

Postby shimman on Thu Jul 15, 2004 5:20 pm

for 108, i don't think zclv will become cav becaseu i think pioneer is still using nec's chipset. this chipset is designed to work as a zclv not cav...not impossible but it will be difficult without adding extra hardware.

only thing we can hope for this drive is to shift to 12x & 16x quicker than it is shown now....perhaps 4x dl -r

if this drive is going to be sold cheaper about 100~130 usd(not xl but 108) those problems can be forgiven easily i think ;)
shimman
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 3:48 pm

Postby dolphinius_rex on Thu Jul 15, 2004 5:52 pm

Hrm, this drive isn't exactly what I had hoped for... I think I'll keep my 107 until the 109 comes out :wink:

My Pioneer 107 is *STILL* the best burner I own, despite buying 2 other drives after it :D
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

Postby Gen-An on Thu Jul 15, 2004 5:58 pm

The 4x DL burn speeds are pretty impressive though. They all were within a few seconds of 27 minutes, which is about expected.
Gen-An
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 6:20 pm

Postby dolphinius_rex on Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:38 pm

CDRinfo.com has stated that booktype is auto set to DVD-ROM for DVD+R9's too.... this is a good thing!
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

Postby pchilson on Thu Jul 15, 2004 7:36 pm

That's sick. This is a pure con job from Pioneer, just another "let's bury one in joe sixpack's a$$".
There isn't any 4x Double Layer media and by the time there is they will have another drive on the market.
Boo hiss if they release this drive like that. :^o
pchilson
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 12:05 am
Location: Colorado

Postby Ian on Thu Jul 15, 2004 7:38 pm

dolphinius_rex wrote:CDRinfo.com has stated that booktype is auto set to DVD-ROM for DVD+R9's too.... this is a good thing!


Interesting. The article at PC Watch does say that, but the discs burned by the drive show as "DVD+R DL" in CD Speed and not "DVD-ROM". Weird...
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 15159
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Postby dolphinius_rex on Thu Jul 15, 2004 7:56 pm

pchilson wrote:That's sick. This is a pure con job from Pioneer, just another "let's bury one in joe sixpack's a$$".
There isn't any 4x Double Layer media and by the time there is they will have another drive on the market.
Boo hiss if they release this drive like that. :^o


No one screamed "boo hiss" when BenQ released the 822a as a dual layer burner, which has still yet to receive the firmware upgrade to make it dual layer compatible, despite multiple dual layer drives now being on the market.

It's normal for drive makers to make drives WAY ahead of available media. Look at 32x CD-RWs for goodness sakes! :lol:

@Ian:
I've seen funny things like that before too... like DVD+Rs showing up as DVD-ROMs, even though the bitsetting wasn't done... and then later showing up as DVD+Rs by simply opening and closing the tray. It could be a bug or a glitch.
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

Postby shimman on Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:36 am

if pio really did put booktype setting chage for +r media (including +r dl), that's a miracle, i say.

pio has been trying to downplay with +r camp because +r camp is hurting patent revenue from -r.....i really hope pio is still developing -r dl
shimman
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 3:48 pm

Postby code65536 on Fri Jul 16, 2004 3:00 am

ROTFL! Z-CLV for 16x? This is sad... as noted in this thread already, 12x P-CAV can beat this 16x Z-CLV by about a minute!
User avatar
code65536
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:18 pm
Location: .us

Postby Kennyshin on Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:06 am

dolphinius_rex wrote:
pchilson wrote:That's sick. This is a pure con job from Pioneer, just another "let's bury one in joe sixpack's a$$".
There isn't any 4x Double Layer media and by the time there is they will have another drive on the market.
Boo hiss if they release this drive like that. :^o


No one screamed "boo hiss" when BenQ released the 822a as a dual layer burner, which has still yet to receive the firmware upgrade to make it dual layer compatible, despite multiple dual layer drives now being on the market.

It's normal for drive makers to make drives WAY ahead of available media. Look at 32x CD-RWs for goodness sakes! :lol:

@Ian:
I've seen funny things like that before too... like DVD+Rs showing up as DVD-ROMs, even though the bitsetting wasn't done... and then later showing up as DVD+Rs by simply opening and closing the tray. It could be a bug or a glitch.


I noticed it, too. Sometimes I wondered if it was GSA-4120B bugl, sometimes writing as DVD+R, and sometimes as DVD-ROM. As long as the dsics are recorded and played well, not a serious problem though.
Kennyshin
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1173
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 12:56 am

Postby Kennyshin on Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:20 am

They must be out of mind to call it 16x drives. 16x only from 4.2gB out of 4.5GB? Probably it also costs more than BenQ DW1620.
Kennyshin
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1173
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 12:56 am

Postby pchilson on Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:50 am

dolphinius_rex wrote:No one screamed "boo hiss" when BenQ released the 822a as a dual layer burner, which has still yet to receive the firmware upgrade to make it dual layer compatible, despite multiple dual layer drives now being on the market.

Deliverd yet or not, Benq never claimed it was in the box.
Pioneer on the other hand is claiming this a 16x drive.
It spends about as much time at 16x as a two dollar hooker spends on her feet...
Are they actually going to be proud of this "achievment"?
The guys running home with this little package under their arm are going to be shocked. Hopefully Pioneer will start reporting POC now.

Is this about what we can expect from NEC's effort?
pchilson
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 12:05 am
Location: Colorado

Postby Kennyshin on Fri Jul 16, 2004 9:15 am

BenQ 1600A is cheap!
Kennyshin
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1173
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 12:56 am

Postby digitaldoc on Fri Jul 16, 2004 11:12 am

We can see that this is not a real 16x drive, and only a marketing ploy. The average user will probably never know the difference. And they probably think their Celeron chip is great too.
BTC 1008
BTC 316c 16x dvd-rom
LiteOn 52327S
LiteOn 52246S
Plextor 12x10x32
Benq 4816P
HP 7200e (retired)
User avatar
digitaldoc
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:46 pm

Next

Return to DVD Writers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2026 CDRLabs Inc.