What seems to be a good quality CD-R? I am still trying to figure out why a majority of people that post on this form seem to like Taiyo Yuden, as the manufacture? Afterall they use the cyanine pigment. Cyanine's ability to maintain reflectivity is poor giving it a life span of about 10 years. It also delivers the weakest reflection contrasts and thus can cause read errors when run on old CD-ROM drives. Now I here cyanine formula has been altered which results in a much higher life span (20 to 50 years). The gold reflection layer has also been replaced by a silver reflection layer this make the color of the bottom appear blue.
I have also reviewed some very interesting sites pertaining to CD-R's. I am not sure if you have read these or not, so I thought I would share them with you:
http://www.mscience.com/faq52.html
and
http://www.angelfire.com/music2/MP3TUTO ... a_help.htm
Afterall coming from a scientific background it is really the math, physics and chemistry that makes a CD-R better or worse in qulaity. There are so many uncontrolable variables that come into play that it really becomes mind boggling to think about. How can the quality of a cd-r be consistant if there are over 250 BILLION CD-R's made per month.
I hear people say they have not had any problem with this barond or the other and they could burn 100 in a row without a single coaster. Does that mean the CD-R has good quality? Maybe, but not necessarily it just means it is compatible with your burner. Also what good it a 100 CD-R's with cyanine dye if they will only last several years at the most.
Any thoughts?

