Home News Reviews Forums Shop


Prescott or Northwood??

CPU's? Motherboards? Video cards? Talk about it here.

Prescott or Northwood??

Postby grouch on Tue Dec 21, 2004 3:43 pm

k, now it's come down between a 3.0C (northwood, 512k) and a 3.0E (prescott, 1mb).
i've heard the northwood is faster than prescott, that prescott gives heat comparable to a amd, but prescott has faster encoding and rendering.

overall, which should i get?? please give me some practical examples of how a northwood would be a better choice than a prescott and vice versa.
given that they are the same price.
thanks.
grouch
CD-RW Thug
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 1:59 am
Location: Toronto

Postby eric93se on Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:01 pm

I went with Prescott (2.8E). Turns out that northwood is easier to overclock. My motherboard cannot unlock the clock . But I hear that prescotts greater than 3.2 are accessible. Depends on your motherboard, so check forums that support your motherboard.


You didn't say whether or not you wanted to OC the processor. If you don't, then definitly go with prescott. I don't have any overheating issues.


I scarped off the heat sink compound that came with the heat sink, then cleaned off the residue with acetone. Then I used Arctic silver 5 heat sink compound.
Benq DW-1640
ASUS 1608P2 >> Crossflashed to Pioneer 110 -> RAM+Bitsetting+removed riplock+RPC1 :D

Boost Mobile stole my minutes, then would rather loose me as a customer than give back my minutes (thieves).
User avatar
eric93se
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 9:22 pm

Postby eric93se on Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:05 pm

Benq DW-1640
ASUS 1608P2 >> Crossflashed to Pioneer 110 -> RAM+Bitsetting+removed riplock+RPC1 :D

Boost Mobile stole my minutes, then would rather loose me as a customer than give back my minutes (thieves).
User avatar
eric93se
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 9:22 pm

Postby hoxlund on Wed Dec 22, 2004 11:09 am

prescott

used to run the p4c800-e deluxe mobo with a 3.0GHz prescott
Thermaltake Core X5 Snow Edition TG Case
Corsair RM1000 Power Supply
MSI X399 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
AMD Threadripper 1950x @ 4.1GHz
Custom Loop w/ EK MSI x399 Monoblock
G.Skill 4x8GB DDR4 3200 RGB Memory
MSI 1080Ti Lightning X Video Card
User avatar
hoxlund
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 12:55 am
Location: Idaho

Postby oslik3 on Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:56 pm

hoxlund,

so...

which one do you like better, now that you have AMD 64 3200+ ? prescott or AMD ?

for purposes of video/audio encoding (no gaming)

thanks !
oslik3
CD-RW Thug
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:12 am
Location: Phila PA

Postby hoxlund on Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:36 pm

for gaming purposes the amd is faster, better FPS

and for encoding and other cpu intenstive stuff, its very close

until i overclock, then its very noticeable that the amd wins
Thermaltake Core X5 Snow Edition TG Case
Corsair RM1000 Power Supply
MSI X399 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
AMD Threadripper 1950x @ 4.1GHz
Custom Loop w/ EK MSI x399 Monoblock
G.Skill 4x8GB DDR4 3200 RGB Memory
MSI 1080Ti Lightning X Video Card
User avatar
hoxlund
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 12:55 am
Location: Idaho

Postby oslik3 on Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:52 pm

thanks for the reply, hoxlund !


i assume your AMD is running somewhat cooler than prescott, or is very close in that dept too ?
oslik3
CD-RW Thug
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:12 am
Location: Phila PA

Postby hoxlund on Wed Dec 22, 2004 11:55 pm

actually no, my 90nm amd runs idle at 94F with stock heatsink/fan

my intel stock heatsink/fan ran idle at around 125Fish
Thermaltake Core X5 Snow Edition TG Case
Corsair RM1000 Power Supply
MSI X399 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
AMD Threadripper 1950x @ 4.1GHz
Custom Loop w/ EK MSI x399 Monoblock
G.Skill 4x8GB DDR4 3200 RGB Memory
MSI 1080Ti Lightning X Video Card
User avatar
hoxlund
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 12:55 am
Location: Idaho

Postby grouch on Fri Dec 24, 2004 1:26 pm

argh..."we all sold out of northwood's...yes we know it was kinda faster and cooler, but intel said to discontinue...yes we kno it's dumb...sorry"
thanks intel...

thinking of getting either the 3.0 or 3.2 prescott now

"My motherboard cannot unlock the clock . But I hear that prescotts greater than 3.2 are accessible"
by clock, that's FSB i'm assuming?? or is it the mulitplier??
and any oc'ing diff between 3.2 and 3.0?? it's $20 CAD difference.
thanks.
grouch
CD-RW Thug
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 1:59 am
Location: Toronto

Postby wiesel on Tue Jan 18, 2005 7:13 am

grouch: not sure if this helps but i found a 3.4GHz Intel Pentium® 4 CPU "Northwood" (800FSB) HT 512k Cache OEM

http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductI ... tID=119884

Good luck
wiesel
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 7:08 am
Location: united kingdom

Postby Ankerson on Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:27 pm

I own both P4's.

Northwood @ 3.06 GHz

And

Prescott P4 Moble @ 2.8 Ghz (Dell Laptop).

I would say the Prescott is the better CPU, my Laptop keeps up with my Desktop in the benchmarks pretty well indeed.

Both are 533 FBS

The Prescott has 1 mb L2 cache while the Northwood has 512k L2 cache.

Both have Hyper Threading.
User avatar
Ankerson
CD-RW Thug
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 11:10 am


Return to General Hardware Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2019 CDRLabs Inc.