Hi...
themaster wrote:Scour wrote:http://technik.movie2digital.de/thread.php?threadid=15834&sid=f66064e4802972d813b38b772a89cd44
I´m disappointed about the error-rates

Unfortunately I confirm with 166s the burned dvd of 4120b have very bad quality, all except ritek g04 with official firmware of 166s have a slow down after the 3° GB.
I think seriousely to change this unit with a nec 2510a.
I have very disappointed to discover that only dvd-ram without cartridge are usable with lg.
Which media have you tested and with which firmware have you read them?
I've a LG GSA 4120, a Benq 800@822 and a Lite-On 165s for reading. I can do a kprobe scan with the 165 or with nero cd-dvd speed with the benq and the 165s. But up to now all (ok, say 90%) of my 4120 burned media showed a better or similar nero cd-dvd speed scan (with my benq) as the benq burned media. The 165 uses a patched firmware for 16x DVD-R reading and i've no problems reading my dvds burned with the 4120 up to the end with high speed.
And maybe you've heard about the c't comparison between KProbe, Nero cd-dvd speed and the plextor tool? They compared the scans of three different burned dvds with the three programs with the "real scan results" of the same three medias scanned on a calibrated hardware from audiodev.
The result: No scan of the user programs showed any similarity with the audiodev scans. Also the PI/PO max/avg. values showed no similarity. The worst dvd media which showed > 1400 PI in audiodev scans had < 20 with kprobe and a 832! PI peak in audiodev scan: None in KProbe, Nero or Plextor tool on the same position.
Conclusion of c't: KProbe is the worst (with 832), nero cd-dvd-speed (Nu-82) is worse and the plextor tool (with 712?!?) is bad. They only show how good that media is readable in this particular drive!
My conclusion: I'm happy if the scans on my hardware shows a low PI/PO because i could read them back in my drives if i've problems with that media in other drives.
Regards,
Gerd