Home News Reviews Forums Shop


LG GSA-4120B - The Plextor 712A Killer?

DVD-R/W, DVD+R/RW, DVD-RAM

Postby MadBurner on Wed May 05, 2004 5:52 pm

My interests have pretty much turned towards the LG GSA-4120B now rather than the PX-712SA. I do not see a solid reason to own both drives and since the LG supports DVD-RAM, that will most likely be the drive I purchase since it looks like both drives will be available sometime in June.

MadBurner
User avatar
MadBurner
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 3:00 pm

Postby ClayBuster on Wed May 05, 2004 5:54 pm

Better fix your Sig. :wink:
Rick
User avatar
ClayBuster
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 1:11 pm
Location: MI.

Postby minchin on Wed May 05, 2004 6:15 pm

Damn.... DVD+R DL? AND DVD-RAM.... this is the real ALL in ONE Drive man....
Time to save up for this drive....
After owning the Plexy 708A for a while, I am not really that impressed with Plextor's stuff that much anymore.... (I came from a long history of Plextor CD-RW, 2-3 SCSI model then this Plexy)
yes, I know that I am using Memorex inconsistent quality DVD+R 4x.... but having yet another drive that needs to oc the media isn't what I would expect Plextor to do too well....

Min
minchin
CD-RW Thug
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 9:33 am

Postby dolphinius_rex on Wed May 05, 2004 6:18 pm

aviationwiz wrote:Hmmm, why Plextor over LG?

1. Firmware upgrades (see above)
2. P-CAV vs Z-CLV
3. SATA vs PATA


I'm not sure how LG's DVD burners are doing with firmware, they are working a lot harder on the DVD burners they make then the CD burners in the past.... Maxell is pushing them a lot harder :wink: (of course Maxell and LG are both owned by Hitachi :P )

P-CAV vs. Z-CLV may not be a bigger issue then speed

3. S.A.T.A. (Something Aviationwiz Toots Alot) vs. P.A.T.A. (Pathetic According To Aviationwiz)
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

Postby MadBurner on Wed May 05, 2004 6:42 pm

ClayBuster wrote:Better fix your Sig. :wink:


I still have not cancelled my pre-order for the drive just yet. I could always put it in my other computer 8)

MadBurner
User avatar
MadBurner
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 3:00 pm

Postby Laher on Wed May 05, 2004 7:24 pm

basically this drive should kill off not only plextor, but lite-on and sony also on their new DL drives!
Laher
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 2:08 pm

Postby cfitz on Wed May 05, 2004 8:00 pm

dolphinius_rex wrote:3. S.A.T.A. (Something Aviationwiz Toots Alot) vs. P.A.T.A. (Pathetic According To Aviationwiz)

:lol: :lol: :lol:

cfitz
cfitz
CD-RW Curmudgeon
 
Posts: 4572
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2002 10:44 am

Postby dodecahedron on Wed May 05, 2004 9:32 pm

aviationwiz wrote:Hmmm, why Plextor over LG?

1. Firmware upgrades (see above)
2. P-CAV vs Z-CLV
3. SATA vs PATA

Hmmm, why LG over Plextor?

1. Writing quality.
2. Writing quality.
3. Writing quality.

oh and almost forgot,
4. DVD-RAM support.
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the land of Mordor, where the Shadows lie
-- JRRT
M.C. Escher - Reptilien
User avatar
dodecahedron
DVD Polygon
 
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 12:04 am
Location: Israel

Postby aviationwiz on Wed May 05, 2004 10:12 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: Plextor is the king of quality, all of the LG drives I have seen haven't compared at all to the Plextor equivalent. :lol: Only nice thing is the DVD-RAM support, which I would NEVER use, and neither would many other people. All of the LG drives suck like that Plextor 40x CD-RW that sucked.
User avatar
aviationwiz
Plextor Fan(atic)
 
Posts: 4069
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:55 am
Location: Home of the Red Tail

Postby pranav81 on Thu May 06, 2004 1:21 am

cfitz wrote:
dolphinius_rex wrote:3. S.A.T.A. (Something Aviationwiz Toots Alot) vs. P.A.T.A. (Pathetic According To Aviationwiz)

:lol: :lol: :lol:

cfitz



I second that.

:lol: :lol: :lol:


::Pranav::
Increasingly mathematics will demand the courage to face its implications.
pranav81
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 6:57 am
Location: Sunnyvale, CA

Postby pranav81 on Thu May 06, 2004 1:24 am

Yeah,Plextor is king of quality,for a premium price.I have owned a lot of LG drives and have upgraded the firmware thousands of times on all those drives,without killing even one.
LG drives are cheap and offer good quality,for me atleast.



::Pranav::
Increasingly mathematics will demand the courage to face its implications.
pranav81
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 6:57 am
Location: Sunnyvale, CA

Postby dolphinius_rex on Thu May 06, 2004 1:44 am

I've been unhappy with Plextor ever since my first Plextor Purchase (the Plextor Premium CD Burner). Ironically, the Plextor Premium is the second most expensive drive I own (second to my Pioneer DVR-107 only), and the least commonly used drive. In fact, up until I got my second computer, I didn't even have it hooked up regularily. I almost didn't even hook it up when I got the second computer either, it was a toss up between the Plextor Premium and a nearly dead LiteON 24101B that was recently given to me. I ended up siding with the Plextor, but it was pretty darn close.

The only reason I might be interested in the Plextor 712a is the error checking ability, but given the Plextor Premium's error checking abilities, and software limitations, I have a feeling I will be totally disappointed with it. After the reports I've seen on the Plextor 708a, I certainly wouldn't jump to the conclusion that Plextor is any kind of quality drive.

LG is proving themselves as a quality drive maker in the DVD burner industry. LiteON is self destructing practically. And Plextor is doing whatever the heck they feel like. But the thing is, that's actually NORMAL for Plextor! :lol:
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

Postby shimman on Thu May 06, 2004 2:45 am

if lg's 4120b's compatability & writing quality is good, i will get one for sure. it might be slower than 712, but i don't think plextor would have improved compatability of 712 dramatically. 708a was way too picky for me.

lg's quality is very good from my experience; they are known for quietness, too.

for sata lovers & ieee1394a lovers, there are pata to sata & ieee1394a converters designed for internal drives for about 20-30usd. my buddy is using the converter for his burners, and it worked very well.

for pcav lovers, check optorite dd0405 with the new firmware, it does pcav from 6x to 8x
http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Article ... 5&Series=0

i only wish that lg adds pi/po jitter for dvd

cannot wait to try 4120b
shimman
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 3:48 pm

Postby Halc on Thu May 06, 2004 4:31 am

What a hilarious discussion. Why do we have to bicker about which one is better? They are just drives :)

We will see which one is "better", when they arrive, have been tested, have been firmware upgraded some times and thoroughly used with various media.

And even after that, some will pick the one that is considered "worse" by others.

I for one will buy the Plextor only to test media.

I wouldn't mind if it didn't burn at all. If it burns really nicely, that's a bonus for me.

But I'm surely not going to declare it winner not now and probably not after I have bought it.

Just the fact that there isn't a single all encompassing winner on the market right now, makes me think that there won't be such in the near future either (as new DL and speed standards are being adopted and everybody will stumble).

As for writing quality. I haven't seen low level measurements from either drive, so I think it is still too early to tell :)
User avatar
Halc
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 9:13 am

Postby Scour on Thu May 06, 2004 7:32 am

Hello!

I have good experiences with Plextor and LG-drives. But the FW-support by Plextor is much better than with LG, but LG is cheaper.

Let´s wait until Ian review both writers :wink:
Benq DW 1640 and 1650 , Plextor PX-755, Pioneer BDR-208 and 209D, LG GH24NSC0, LG BH16NS40 and 16NS55, Liteon ihas 124F and 324F, Pioneer DVR-215 and S21, Samsung SH-224DB and 224GB, and some more

cu
Scour
Scour
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 1934
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Germany

Postby Ian on Thu May 06, 2004 8:01 am

Pictures are working now..

Image

Image
Last edited by Ian on Thu May 06, 2004 10:15 am, edited 2 times in total.
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 15159
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Postby dodecahedron on Thu May 06, 2004 9:48 am

why are the pictures not working?

Ian, what's the firmware on the drive? it's kind of hard to see in that pic.
N08F?
not very in line with LG's usual firmware naming scheme, is it?
Last edited by dodecahedron on Thu May 06, 2004 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the land of Mordor, where the Shadows lie
-- JRRT
M.C. Escher - Reptilien
User avatar
dodecahedron
DVD Polygon
 
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 12:04 am
Location: Israel

Postby socheat on Thu May 06, 2004 10:16 am

dodecahedron wrote:why are the pictures not working?


From what I can tell, I think it's a change in the new phpBB code. When using the phpBB img tags, they check for an image file extension (.jpg/.gif, etc). It will only display the image if an extensions exists. I modified our code that loads images from the database to account for this, and should work now.
User avatar
socheat
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Postby Ian on Thu May 06, 2004 10:17 am

dodecahedron wrote:why are the pictures not working?

Ian, what's the firmware on the drive? it's kind of hard to see in that pic.
N08F?
not very in line with LG's usual firmware naming scheme, is it?


The version of phpBB doesn't like images without an extension. Why it still works with my old posts is beyond me.

Since this seems to be an engineering sample, its probably an early version of the firmware. Then again, they might have changed it. I really dunno. I haven't been able to get much info out of LG. My contact has been MIA the last few days.
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 15159
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Postby MediumRare on Thu May 06, 2004 10:27 am

Ian,
have you tried the new beta of CD/DVD speed with this drive? Does it support PI/PO and/or jitter reports?

G
User avatar
MediumRare
CD-RW Translator
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 3:08 pm
Location: ffm

Postby Ian on Thu May 06, 2004 10:36 am

MediumRare wrote:Ian,
have you tried the new beta of CD/DVD speed with this drive? Does it support PI/PO and/or jitter reports?

G


No, I haven't. If I have some time tonite, I'll see.
"Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt." - Steve Jobs
User avatar
Ian
Grand Poobah
 
Posts: 15159
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 2:34 pm
Location: Madison, WI

Postby shimman on Thu May 06, 2004 11:42 am

of course Maxell and LG are both owned by Hitachi


don't know about maxwll, but lg is not owned by hitachi. Hitachi-LG Data Storage is a joint venture of lg electronics & hitachi(hitachi holds 51% & lg holds 49%) drives are designed & developed by lg with components from hitachi. lg sold its semiconductor unit to hyundai semiconductor...now hynix

because of hitachi, lg's drives got worse than they could have
shimman
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 3:48 pm

Postby Shredder on Thu May 06, 2004 11:47 am

aviationwiz wrote:3. SATA vs PATA



As I said in my previous post, if Plextor uses PATA-to-SATA adapter, it may lack of the features of SATA which resembles SCSI which means it makes very little performance improvement (given that SATA controller has better throughput and low resource usage than PATA controller) if any. Possibly better airflow within the system because of thin SATA cables.
User avatar
Shredder
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 7:38 pm

Postby dr_st on Thu May 06, 2004 12:11 pm

I'll still go with LG. No reason whatsoever to change a winning horse. Then again, my next DVD burner will probably be one of those next-gen burners which can put more than 4.37 gigs on the CD, so that can take a while.
dr_st
Buffer Underrun
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 11:09 am

Postby dolphinius_rex on Thu May 06, 2004 1:12 pm

shimman wrote:
of course Maxell and LG are both owned by Hitachi


don't know about maxwll, but lg is not owned by hitachi. Hitachi-LG Data Storage is a joint venture of lg electronics & hitachi(hitachi holds 51% & lg holds 49%) drives are designed & developed by lg with components from hitachi. lg sold its semiconductor unit to hyundai semiconductor...now hynix

because of hitachi, lg's drives got worse than they could have


Funny, that's not what Maxell says...
Punch Cards -> Paper Tape -> Tape Drive -> 8" Floppy Diskette -> 5 1/4" Floppy Diskette -> 3 1/2" "Flippy" Diskette -> CD-R -> DVD±R -> BD-R

The Progression of Computer Media
User avatar
dolphinius_rex
CD-RW Player
 
Posts: 6923
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 6:14 pm
Location: Vancouver B.C. Canada

PreviousNext

Return to DVD Writers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

All Content is Copyright (c) 2001-2026 CDRLabs Inc.